![]() Or the Shroud of Turin? It’s enough to make one discount anything that turns up as "evidence" of anything religious at all. She was a writer and a translator for OGN global. The 24-year-old found the friend as well as a love of his life. Shroud kindled a romantic relationship with a lady who is also a Twitch streamer. ![]() Remember the "Jesus Box? It’s still on trial. Jessica Rago (Shroud girlfriend Jess or Jessica) a half-Korean, Italian, and Irish was Shroud’s ex-girlfriend. Twitch Streamer Shroud aka Michael Grzesiek is currently in a lovey-dovey relationship with girlfriend (Bnans) Hannah Kennedy. The so-called "Gospel of Jesus’s Wife" is now joining a storied lineup of Jesus-related relics suspected of being fraudulent. Next month there’s another "scientific" account of Noah’s Ark being published.)īut how do I as a non-specialist know when to roll my eyes? In 2007 Biblical archaeologist Eric Cline wrote in an editorial: "When most archeologists and biblical scholars hear that someone has (yet again) discovered Noah’s Ark, they roll their eyes and get on with their business." (But the lack of acknowledgement from legitimate archaeology in no way stems the tide of these discoveries and their announcements. Some "scientific" discoveries are counted out by virtue of the unlikeliness of their claims. What I do know is that whenever a scientific discovery having to do with religious texts, sites, or history becomes public, it goes through a a news cycle that’s becoming familiar: giddy excitement, intense skepticism, and cynical acceptance. Do we also need some way of showing that a link is irrelevant to the point being made? Les Stroud has a net worth estimated to be around 5.5 million as of August 2023. I often wonder if we need something to replace the question mark for attempts at being rhetorical. He is a filmmaker, a musician, and a survival expert who has braved the wilderness in various locations around the world. Does that make sense? The link in the sentence is to a CBS story about de Wesselow’s theory. The article is entitled, New clues cast doubt on ‘Gospel of Jesus’ Wife’.It begins: It seemed real it seemed fake it seemed real again now we’re back to fake. ![]() It is taken home by the wife-taking line, who have by then serviced the mortuary rites of. She writes about The News Cycle of Jesus’ Wife in the Huffington Post. their wives, the local textile forms part of the severed shroud. Brook Wilensky-Lanford thinks she understands.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |